what

https://www.uleth.ca/dspace/bitstream/handle/10133/3768/MACK_AMY_MA_2015.pdf

I literally can't even.

I actually read it, well, skimmed most of it. half of it was pulled out of their asses and lots of the comparison to Arma 3 are just plain retarted. You can't compare Delta Force 1 to Arma 3. I played Delta Force 1 and it wasn't that pixilated as they claimed it was. it just anti-aliasing, supersampling, digital discrete signal of pixal wasn't where it was at that time compared to now. and plus these two game are far apart in the gaming development years. Check this out too.

 ---How older gen games created a single line in a video game https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bresenham%27s_line_algorithm https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xiaolin_Wu%27s_line_algorithm)
---How textures work and created
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Texture_mapping#Perspective_correctness


they don't really know what they are talking about, but giving a personal opinion and overview of the game.

The main difference between game is basicly the math that is used
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ovLbCvq7FNA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rjLJIVoQxz4

That Doctoral Degree doesn't go indepth into that and how arma 3 works in the back end.

That said, i thing AgentRev, you earned your doctorate degree for Arma 3 and this guy gets an "C" grade.

Didn't even know you can get a Doctoral Degree on this type of BS. 

Well it's not a doctorate thesis, but rather Master of Arts in Anthropology. Still baffling nonetheless, it clearly shows how humanities are struggling to find relevant shit to work on. I bet the only reason it passed defence is because the examiners had poor knowledge of gaming.